Cyberbullying Threatening Activities Samples †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: Discuss about the Cyberbullying Is No Different From Conventional Bullying And There Is No Need For Additional Laws To Regulate Cyberbullying. Answer: Cyberbullying involves online threatening activities or intimidation to innocent target person. On the other hand, conventional bullying involves physical contact between parties involved. Taking cyberbullying similar to conventional bullying might bring a lot of controversy since they differ in nature of occurrence and geographical location. For conventional bullying to take place, subject parties should be physically present and intimidation may involve body harm. With cyberbullying, there is no physical body injury as it mainly involves threats through messages and pictures forms. The reality is that, the two forms of bullying cannot be controlled and regulated using the same laws since they are quite different. The first issue that makes cyberbullying different is its nature of occurrence (Patchin Hinduja 2010, p. 615-616). It takes place online where both parties are connected to internet and certain platform is used as a means of communication. Mainly, according Gillespie (2006, p. 128), to cyberbullying is known to take place over the social media where people interact with strangers and start behaving as if they are long serving fiends. After either a long or short period of time, one of the subject parties turn cruel and starts intimidating the second party. Mainly, it is common between opposite gender where exchange of nude pictures turn rude and one party threatens to expose the whole scenario online. Similarly, it may take place through exchange of messages which compels an individual to act wilfully to the demand of the second party. In this regard, laws governing cyberbullying should be internationally formulated since it is a worldwide problem and takes place from different geographical locations (Cassidy, Faucher Jackson 2013, p. 575). It can be on the same country or different countries which requires international cooperation to tame it down. With conventional bullying, since it takes place between two parties which are present at the scene of the event, it is possible to control and does not require international cooperation (Hinduja Patchin 2014, p. 71). It may involve body harm while one party is trying to compel the second one to act accordingly. In this case, the nature of bullying may range from sexual assault to mental assault because both of the parties can act in any way to compel the other. Laws governing conventional bullying are only restricted to one state. Though it may involve individuals from different country, it nature can be treated as an affair of one state because at the time of the event, all parti es were governed by common law irrespective of their country of originality. In conclusion, cyberbullying and conventional bullying ought to be treated differently because they are different in nature and place of occurrence. Cyberbullying is an online event which requires international cooperation to tame it. Conventional bullying is an offline event which can only be solved through application of one state laws. Due to observable difference in the two forms of bullying and sophisticated nature of cyberbullying, there is need to enact more laws which would help to solve the latter. Assuming both cyberbullying and conventional bullying are equal complicates the nature of regulating cyberbullying due to limitation offered by conventional bullying nature of the law. Bibliography Cassidy, W., Faucher, C. and Jackson, M., 2013. Cyberbullying among youth: A comprehensive review of current international research and its implications and application to policy and practice. School Psychology International, 34(6), pp.575-612. Gillespie, A.A., 2006. Cyber?bullying and harassment of teenagers: The legal response. Journal of Social Welfare Family Law, 28(2), pp.123-136. Hinduja, S. and Patchin, J.W., 2014. Bullying beyond the schoolyard: Preventing and responding to cyberbullying. Corwin Press, pp.59-89. Patchin, J.W. and Hinduja, S., 2010. Cyberbullying and self?esteem. Journal of school health, 80(12), pp.614-621.